Court to Decide on EFCC’s Bid to Re-present Evidence in Yahaya Bello Trial
The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned proceedings in the trial of former Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello, to rule on an application by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission seeking to re-present an exhibit to its witness.
Justice Emeka Nwite fixed April 24 for the ruling after hearing arguments from EFCC counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, and defence lawyer, Joseph Daudu.
The dispute arose during the testimony of Abdullahi Jamilu, the 12th prosecution witness, whose court evidence appeared to conflict with his earlier statement to the EFCC, already admitted as Exhibit 46.
During proceedings, the prosecution sought to show the witness his prior statement to refresh his memory following what it described as inconsistencies. However, the defence objected, arguing that the prosecution must first seek the court’s permission to declare the witness hostile before attempting to contradict him.
Daudu maintained that presenting the earlier statement without following due legal procedure would amount to an improper attempt to challenge the witness’s credibility. In response, Pinheiro insisted the move was solely to aid the witness’s recollection, citing provisions of the Evidence Act that allow such action.
After listening to both sides, Justice Nwite adjourned to determine whether the prosecution can lawfully re-present the exhibit and proceed with the witness examination.
Earlier in his testimony, Jamilu, owner of Kumfayakum Global Limited, told the court he did not personally make certain cash deposits at a Lokoja branch of Access Bank, though his name may have appeared in transaction records. He attributed the deposits to one Abba Adaudu, stating that he converted the funds into U.S. dollars and returned them to Adaudu.
He also confirmed multiple transactions involving companies linked to Adaudu, including significant transfers from Keyless Nature Limited and an inflow from Ejadams Essence Limited.
The case is expected to continue following the court’s ruling.
